“Howard Roark laughed.
He stood naked at the edge of a cliff. The lake lay far below him. A frozen explosion of granite burst in flight to the sky over motionless water. The water seemed immovable, the stone — flowing. The stone had a stillness of one brief moment in battle when thrust meets thrust and the currents are held in a pause more dynamic than motion. The stone glowed, wet with sunrays.”
— The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand.
One of the first serious novels I read. The first sentence leaves absolutely no doubt about who the book was about, even though these opening paragraphs are identified in Part One – Peter Keating. This is Howard Roark’s story.
And so many questions raised by this beginning.
Who the heck is this crazy guy standing naked at the edge of a cliff? Why did he laugh? Will he jump? Is he suicidal?
And Rand’s choice of words. Yes, maybe a little melodramatic, but they weigh heavily with importance. As it turns out, this Roark fellow was indeed very serious.
The book is not without controversy and many think the it’s over-rated. When I first read the book in my twenties, the background philosophy espoused by Rand flew right over my head, as did the possibility that the story puts women in a subservient role to men. For me, it was about Roark’s belief in his work – architecture – and his unwillingness to compromise his principles for either money or fame. But because his talent was so deep, and because the power of his personality was so great, Roark survived. And in the end, he was the only one with his integrity in tact.
And it ends like this:
“She saw him standing above her, on the top platform of the Wynand Building. He waved to her.
The line of the ocean cut the sky. The ocean mounted as the city descended. She passed the pinnacles of bank buildings. She passed the crowns of the courthouses. She rose above the spires of churches.
Then there was only the ocean and the sky and the figure of Howard Roark.”
July 11, 2017 at 8:52 am
My own first impression of The Fountainhead was quite different than many. I get the impression that most people take the political/ethical philosophy quite seriously but downplay the aesthetic/artistic value. I, on the other hand, was surprised at the high literary quality of the writing (including the passages you cite), but found the political/ethical philosophy ranged from trite to toxic (albeit with a few teaspoons of sugar mixed in 🙂 )
LikeLiked by 1 person
July 11, 2017 at 9:04 am
After my formal education was complete, I wasn’t interested in literature at all. Then, following some life-changing events, I decided I should read more. The Fountainhead was the first book in that phase of my life. As one involved in the world of architecture, I was just so into the story, I hardly noticed the philosophical aspects, and was too uneducated to know how good it was. But the more I read other work, the more I appreciated the breadth and depth of The Fountainhead.
Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
July 11, 2017 at 9:26 am
Being an architect must give you a very interesting point of entry into the scaffolding of ideas in The Fountainhead, with its fascinating cubist descriptive passages, its sustained metaphors, etc. All straight lines and angles and cuts of shadow. As I’ve hinted, I’m not a big Rand fan but I appreciate these aesthetic aspects of her work and the fact that she raises interesting questions (though I might answer those questions differently).
LikeLike
July 11, 2017 at 9:30 am
As a footnote, having enjoyed The Fountainhead so much, I’ve tried on several occasions to read Atlas Shrugged. I could never get past the first several pages. I don’t know why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
July 11, 2017 at 3:09 pm
I loved the Fountainhead when I read it in High School. I know nothing about writing but I loved the story. I also loved Atlas Shrugged as an adult, except I confess I skimmed through a couple of the longer winded speeches. There are some eerily prophetic scenes in Atlas Shrugged.
I agree that Rand can be a bit melodramatic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
July 11, 2017 at 3:54 pm
Who is John Galt?
LikeLike